Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Poor Officiating

Here’s an analogy. A rainy day is to an outdoor wedding as poor officiating is to sports. It ruins pretty much everything you intend to do. You generally play competitive sport not only for the love of the game, but to win; however, when you can’t determine a clear winner due to outside effects which should be just that – outside – the result is muddled.

Last weekend, in both professional and college football, poor officiating did in the Philadelphia Eagles and Oklahoma Sooners. Tied at 24 in the overtime session, Brian Dawkins seemingly intercepted a pass in which Vincente Shiancoe placed a hand on [followed his second hand]. A loose paraphrase of the NFL rule states that if both players catch the ball, the tie goes to the offensive player. Having spoken to a few non-Eagles fans and seeing the play with my own eyes, I’m appalled not only that the Eagles were not awarded the ball, but also that the play was not reviewed. In regulation, the referees wasted time reviewing an obvious catch by Amani Toomer to the chagrin of both coaches. Given that, why don’t you check the play that is in heavier doubt? Isn’t the role of officials in sport to get it right and maintain the sanctity [and sanity] of the game? Blame it on lazy officials who rely on replay to have their back and an internally-flawed replay system based on conclusive video evidence to overturn obvious initial mistakes. Add a society where admittance of being dead wrong the first time around is a major weakness, and you have where we’re heading with sports. All in all, the Eagles will rebound from this loss in which dropped passes and complacency played a larger part in their defeat.

Now, let’s add BCS Bowl money and the millions it brings to the equation.

The Oklahoma Sooners had their slim national title hopes crushed on Saturday by two critical referee mistakes in their 34-33 loss to Oregon. First, how did they get it wrong? More importantly, how did they get it dead wrong in a ‘get-it-right’ style of instant replay? They just did. I refuse to justify anything the PAC-10 does. Is there an East Coast bias? Hell yes. ESPN didn’t start in Palo Alto. It started in Bristol. That’s a whole ‘nother entry. A win in Eugene would’ve made the Sooners a good contender for a BCS Bowl now that there are five. So much for that. That is just one year. How about history?

Now, let’s go back to January 19, 2002.

Yes, I’m going there and by the time, I finish writing this, you will have said “he went there.” On this snowy night, Tom Brady and the Patriots benefited from the infamous tuck role and won a game in overtime that they should’ve lost. This not only got them an undeserved ticket to Pittsburgh for the AFC Championship game – it altered football as we know it. No win in Pittsburgh, no Super Bowl with the Patriots being announced as a team, no acceptance speech by Patriots owner Robert Kraft exclaiming that “Spirituality, faith, and democracy are the cornerstones of our country …” in an emotional season after the global tragedy of 9/11. Squadoosh. Those two Super Bowls that followed. Probably not both, but maybe one. Sure, the Raiders went to the Super Bowl the next year, but they were not as stout defensively as the team that got thumped by the Bucs and it led to their demise.

Poor officiating is not exclusive to football. It happens in almost every sport. Nevertheless, it’s something we could all do without. Sure, it gives me more to talk about, but I’d rather focus more attention on the things that deserve more attention – the action on the field, coaching, and play-calling.

4 comments:

Fuego said...

The fact of the matter is that there will always be mistakes (though certainly not as egregious) in replay and officiating, because when all is said and done we are human. While bad calls can have an effect on the outcome of a game, they are not the main cause for a team's win or loss.

In the example of Oregon/OU game: Even though the ball was tipped early, it was tipped right into the lap of an OU player who did not secure it. The defense then gave up 52 yards in 2 plays for the go-ahead score. OU still had a chance to win at the end, but kicked the FG so low that my 11 year old cousin could have blocked it. Furthermore, OU's last two scores in the 4th quarter were FG's of 20 and 22 yards. If they had the ability to stick just one of those in the endzone the call would have been a non-issue.

Bad calls suck, no two ways about it. But they happen and will continue to happen until the end of time. The Oklahoma program (including their President) put a lot of focus on the poor officiating in that game. Let's hope they put the same amount of focus on their performance if they want to be ready for Texas on Saturday.

Paymon said...

The fact of the matter is also that there will be mistakes made on the field by the players. Remember that these are college players.

If you take out the referee mistakes throughout the game, Oklahoma wins that game no matter what. That is my point. Oregon's a stronger team and would win 7 times out of 10 in my opinion, but the zebras handed them that 8th victory.

It is a shame. The utter lack of accountability is worse. The supposedly suspended refs had a game the next week with Stoops' brother (Arizona v. USC) because the PAC-10 didn't have enough crews and didn't want to pay another conference for theirs.

Fuego said...

Also shameful that they had a PAC-10 officiating crew for a PAC-10 interconference home game.

Fuego said...

Well Pay. Now you can write a footnote to this article. Did you see the horrible PI call in the PSU/Minnesota game that kept PSU alive to win in OT?