Let ‘em Play: An Alternative Approach To Selecting the Last Four In
Another weekend in March has passed us by, and again there are countless grumblings about how the NCAA Selection Committee has “fudged the bucket” once again. Don’t get me wrong at all, with seedings like Duke as a 6 and
Each year there are about 12 – 20 legitimate “bubble” teams. Unfortunately, there are only about 4-8 spots available for them per year, and this leads to blasphemous decisions such as Air Force getting in last year, Arkansas, Purdue, Illinois and Stanford getting in this year, and other deserving teams being left out. Of course, there are people that will disagree with my assessment that Drexel deserved to get in this year and
Here’s how I see it playing out. First, let’s get rid of the dreaded play-in game, so we’ll have 31 automatic bids and 33 at-large bids. I mean, why should a team who earned its way in via winning its conference tourney have to take a back seat to a team that “bubbled” it’s way in? Selection Sunday rolls around, and the committee announces 15 teams in each of the 4 regions. However, the 12-seed will be left blank in all four regions. Then, the committee names 16 bubble teams. These 16 are broken into 4 pods of 4 teams each, with each pod being attached to one of the regions. Each pod will be a 2-day tournament with the winner getting into the attached region as the 12-seed. The location for each mini-tourney will be wherever the 12-seed for each region would play in the first round. The games would take place on Tuesday and Wednesday, and the 12-seeds would play their first round games on the Friday.
Confusing? Somewhat. This is one way that the tourney can be “expanded” without making it obscene. This way, if a bubble team doesn’t make the tournament, it blames itself instead of the pompous committee with the chair who provides vague answers for why Team D deserves to be in over Team A.
No comments:
Post a Comment