Tuesday, February 06, 2007

NCAA Bracket-Related Questions

Kevin Durant: Is his magical play creating an illusion with regard to Texas' resume?

(courtesy: www.texassports.com)

Today's edition of the NCAA Tournament Bracket-related questions addresses the most pressing questions with respect to yesterday's bracket projections. It also examines surprising underachievement from a trio of marquee coaches.

Q: Which of your current 12 seeds would you bet on most to beat a 5?
A: It's a flip of the coin between Appalachian St. and Winthrop, but the nod would have to go to Winthrop. Just look at their non-conference schedule. They are afraid of no one and will play anyone on any court. They took one #1 seed to the wire (North Carolina) and another to overtime (Wisconsin).

Q: You have Southern Illinois as a 3. Who have they beaten to deserve that?
A: I guess I'm guilty of the RPI bug. Coming into Monday's action, SIU had a share (Creighton) of the Missouri Valley (5th-rated conference according to the RPI) with a 10-3 record. Their RPI is a sizzling 9 and their strength-of-schedule is 31st. I understand that their best wins are within the Valley, but the MVC is better than the Big East this season and has much more parity than the Big East and Big Ten. Lately, the Salukis have smothered teams, holding their last two opponents under 50. This week, SIU has home bouts versus Bradley and Creighton, both of whom are currently in the RPI Top 50.

Q: Why do you spit so much venom in Duke's direction?
A: This is a multi-part answer. First, let's get my bias out of the way. I'm a North Carolina fan and have been one since I started following college basketball twenty years ago. Second, the media is Duke-driven. ESPN's top color commentator has a well-known nickname (Dukie V) and the rising star at ESPN (Jay "Duke Boy" Bilas) was a player and assistant under Coach K. Third, if you take the name out of this year's resume, as we speak, Duke may be grazing the 6 or 7 line. Right now, they're a team that cannot score points, and that makes you susceptible against all teams.

Q: Who are your 3 worst coaches among those who have won a national title?
A: My first spot goes to Jim Boeheim. I know, he lost his leader in G-Mac, but their current showing is ridiculous. The Carrier Dome advantage is a joke this season. I know that I don't know the whole story, but I know enough to tell this one.
My second spot goes to Coach K. If Dick Vitale wasn't such a Dukie, he would say "Coach K has been bad with a capital 'B', baby!" Instead, we have to hear about his split duties between coaching Team USA and Duke. Mike D'Antoni seems to be doing just fine. The point is, Duke gets top 50 recruits every year and any time that any of them produce, K is a mastermind in the eyes of everyone with a microphone near them. McRoberts would've been far more developed by now and a bona fide star anywhere else, save the NBA. They fear saying that he might be 4-5 in the conference with marquee players if the referees had paid attention to the game versus Clemson (there were other bad calls in addition to the clock problem).
My third spot goes to Lute Olsen. He's a god in Tucson and their fans are brainwashed. The fact of the matter is that a team with this type of talent should not be reeling at 6-5 in conference play and be beaten by 28 on its home floor by anyone. Olsen, who is starting to receive criticism, has failed to develop any semblance of a bench and this has placed a heavier burden on the starting five.

Q: You have Texas as the last team in the field. Why aren't they higher?
A: I think the cream will rise to the top eventually. Even if it doesn't, the selection committee will do all in its power to have Kevin Durant play for at least one round. Right now, as a basketball team, they're an optical illusion in the eyes of many bracketologists. Their best wins are versus Arkansas and at Texas Tech. Their win against LSU on a neutral court was once strong, but that victory has gone tumbling down in value almost as fast as the Tigers' prestige. Texas should gather more signature wins, but at present, they are the 6th-best team in what should be no more than a five-bid league.

No comments: